A bunch of people contacted me about how terrible it was and how terrible it was that reviewers were lavishing it with such praise. If you want, I can explain to you why I loved Gone Home, why I liked Firewatch a lot, why I thought Lieve Oma was fine but also a missed opportunity, and why Fragments of Him didn’t do it for me. We aren’t zombies - different games have different strong and weak suits. In reality, those of us who sometimes enjoy artsy games are - shockingly - capable of explaining why we enjoy the ones we enjoy, speaking coherently about which elements work and which ones don’t, and so on. This is dumb straw-man pandering and it makes me cringe to even engage with it - for Chrissake, many of the exact same critics who rate “walking simulators” highly also rate AAA shoot-’em-ups highly! - but it highlights an important myth driving VGCW complaints: that all the artsy games they hate constitute one terrible stew. Writes Singal in response to Hick's claim that scores are inflated by " Feminist Frequency types": In essence, these are the flipside of the "Social Justice Warrior" or SJW coin. Singal counters that all of this is a bit preposterous, while granting that "artsy" games of this nature may indeed be graded on a curve. He describes people upset over this type of game as "Video Game Culture Warriors" or VGCW's for short. Not all buyers have "invariably" asked for refunds. Those buyers invariably get upset and demand refunds."Īs far as I'm aware, Virginia has received a mixed response. " It wouldn’t be an issue if the game weren’t being pushed so favorably by the favorable press," writes Cheong, "which deludes people into purchasing it. And unsurprisingly they rarely hold up.Ĭheong agrees, arguing that anyone who criticizes this genre is labeled a "racist misogynist." He also argues that the press is deluding gamers into purchasing Virginia, which apparently must have no merits whatsoever. The underlying sentiment among the low scorers seems to be that because these games try so hard be like films, they should be compared to them. Reviews of these games are often polarized. While the progressive cabal of reviewers are tripping over themselves to praise walking simulators, others score them incredibly low. Many jaded, liberal, gen-X reviewers inflate the scores of these titles, saying these are finally games made for “adults,” and chiding the wider industry for its perceived immaturity. These types of games are beloved by Feminist Frequency types who hail them as brilliant alternatives to the “male power fantasy” inherent in most big budget violent games.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |